Miscegenation Is America
Henry Louis Gates, Jr., anti-white professor, can barley contain his glee over the fact that American blacks have white ancestors.
| The Colbert Report | Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c | |||
| Henry Louis Gates, Jr. | ||||
|
||||
How do they reconcile Colbert being a pure European with the no such thing as race dogma? There’s no logic anywhere to PC. Race has no biological reality until DNA can be used to promote diversity and prove miscegenation, treat people as individuals except when whites suffer from affirmative action, ethnic pride is OK except when it’s whites, etc. Everything from science or history gets processed through some anti-white diversity logical formula and comes out looking absurd to the few men who can think for themselves.
19 Comments
Feb 5, 2010 4:07 pm |
Isn’t american black’s european admixture mostly due to white male slavers impregnating black female slaves? That doesn’t really seem like it counts as evidence of “everybody sleeping with everybody else.”
“No such thing as race” is yesterdays dogma; it’s now been upgraded to “race is undeniable, but all racial and ethnic differences are totally superficial,” which places genealogical differences on the same level as ecumenical differences (colbert’s luthern “mistake”). Insane.
Feb 5, 2010 4:14 pm |
I love how “race doesn’t exist biologically; well, actually only when we can prove we’re all the same!”
This is the exact definition of doublethink. And the fact that Henry Gates can parade around the media and get his own PBS special on race after his true ideas came out during the summer is disgusting (but not surprising). He pals around with A-LIst celebrities while James Watson, ironically the discoverer of the thing Gates’ is looking at it in this study (well he’s not looking at it people who actualy understand science are), sits at home, forever defamed as a senile racist.
Feb 5, 2010 5:48 pm |
__
Don’t kid yourself here, Richard et al, many MANY Blacks (and Browns) still really do wish that they were White, or at least interpersonally accepted by Whites in the social realm, REGARDLESS of how they may ‘be hatin’ on ‘Whitey’ in the public realm.
This is just a con-game of theirs (and more importantly – Liberals) to demoralize Whites into losing any sense of pride, and especially any sense of group solidarity – so as better to make them accept miscegenation and the disappearance of their unique cultures and nation-states.
It is often said that ‘imitation is the sincerest form of flattery’… apparently so is envy.
~
To quote the intrepid Black blogger Elizabeth Wright conversing with one of her commentators:
http://issuesviews.blogspot.com/2009/10/doing-away-with-those-british-anglos.html
~
*Truth is often stranger than fiction indeed!
Feb 5, 2010 7:30 pm |
Kuato: Huh, that’s fascinating. Makes a certain amount of sense when you consider the two groups bell curves. I haven’t run across much interesting black culture beyond some music and less comedy, but from a black perspective, I suppose white cultural predominance itself (esp. in high culture) would be striking.
This marks the first time I’ve seen intellectual honesty from a black commentator on the internet.
Feb 5, 2010 8:36 pm |
Don’t kid yourself here, Richard et al, many MANY Blacks (and Browns) still really do wish that they were White, or at least interpersonally accepted by Whites in the social realm, REGARDLESS of how they may ‘be hatin’ on ‘Whitey’ in the public realm.
Nothing new about that.
Feb 5, 2010 9:29 pm |
I think of the black-white dialog in the USA as a peculiarly inbred event, even though superficially it is about outbreeding. To much of the rest of the world this is just a bunch of hot air and totally uninteresting. Can you imagine a resident of Tokyo not yawning to death listening to this?
Seriously, the world center of gravity has shifted east to the land of the ethnocentrics. In a few decades the powers that be will be identifiably ethnic peoples, specifically Han Chinese, and Indian. All of the great multicultural talk will be seen for what it is, colonialism backwashing all over us, a tempest in a teapot, a whirlpool in a drain. Gurgle.
Feb 6, 2010 12:58 am |
This marks the first time I’ve seen intellectual honesty from a black commentator on the internet.
–
Sepulveda,
I know my friend, right?
Actually, Elizabeth Wright is one of the most articulate and intelligent writers on the ‘Right’ in the whole blogosphere. She is additionally a very thoughtful and kind lady, who genuinely and openly respects White Americans, their accomplishments, and, as she says, the kindness and compassion that they often show to Black and Brown Americans, and all other Peoples throughout the world. (She is a major Pat Buchanan supporter and has published articles for Jared Taylor and the American Renaissance.)
She gets really upset when this decency of Whites towards other races goes unrequited and unappreciated — and she adamantly knows this is overwhelmingly due to envy.
She demands that White Americans start sticking up for themselves and insisting they stop groveling and apologizing — essentially over nothing, since this also just encourages even worse behavior on the part of Minorities toward the White Majority.
I sourced and quoted her extensively when I did my research thesis on ‘Race and Globalism’ when I was in grad school at Georgetown University.
*Please, Sep, you and all reading this here — check out here blog, and hopefully become regular readers of her excellent work.
Feb 6, 2010 8:50 pm |
Seriously, who cares who effed whom two hundred years ago?
White Americans groveling and apologizing?
How about being sold out by global interests?
People apologize when they can afford to. White Americans are no “nicer” than anyone else. They have just been spared invasions.
When people see a few of their own shot against a wall for simply being who they are the questions that plague us today would never arise. Gee, “Who are We” as Samuel Huntington asks. We’re the guy getting shot, that’s who.
Never forget that America did not suffer significantly during WW2. This fact alone explains much of the lunacy that passes for political dialog in this most insulated of nations.
Feb 6, 2010 9:54 pm |
“Never forget that America did not suffer significantly during WW2.”
Tell that to the hundreds of thousands of Americans who never saw their loved one again.
Feb 6, 2010 10:09 pm |
Well, it could be put more delicately – but it’s true, and it does explain a lot. We suffered much less than Europe in WWI too.
Few ever went hungry here either, they way they did in Europe til circa 1800. I wonder if that has also had some effect along similar lines. For a man not rich, in 1770 it was basically heaven here compared to Europe.
Americans may be selected for low xenophobia too. Even people who came here from Britain faced a somewhat different culture. And of course others were coming from a different culture altogether. All this helps explain the high amount of idiocy and racial masochism coming out of my country.
Feb 6, 2010 10:12 pm |
Not to mention, we’ve always had black people around and (going back as far as the abolitionism era) many white Americans don’t want to demoralize them by believing in racial differences.
Feb 7, 2010 12:08 am |
I don’t get it. Been to Europe lately? Familiar with what passes for political dialogue there?
Feb 7, 2010 10:24 am |
Well, my impression was that a lot of that racial masochism stuff flowed from America to Europe. But I guess I don’t know as much about that as half-consciously imagined I did.
Certainly, America was the first to be something of a “proposition” nation and the first without an established religion. These things largely derived from the circumstances of America’s founding, but they were still unique and influential. And they go back pretty far — things like rather indiscriminate immigration do.
I would imagine that one probably very important influence coming out of America was Boasian anthropology?
The one European nation whose immigration history I know a little about is Germany, where around 1960, robust economic recovery from the war created a (perceived) labor shortage that caused “guest workers” to be imported from elsewhere (especially Turkey) by bilateral government agreements. Wikipedia claims this was a quite “innocent” project in which everyone believed the guests would really return home. I’m a little wary of accepting that. In any case, most of them didn’t return (however that worked out), but did bring in their families, and Germany is now something like 7-10% Turkish if I recall. Anyone have any good sources on how this happened — who (if anyone) thought this was a bad idea in the first place, who tried to stop the residential-ization of the “guests,” and what forces caused such efforts to fail?
I’m not saying all the idiocy in Europe came from America, of course. I would imagine they had their own overreactions against Nazi racialism? It’s natural I guess to overreact against the enemy ideology when you fight an a somewhat existential war.
Feb 7, 2010 11:49 am |
“Everything from science or history gets processed through some anti-white diversity logical formula and comes out looking absurd to the few men who can think for themselves.”
Well said. A lot of people on the left promote miscegenation as a way of strengthening the human gene pool and producing genetically superior hybrids who are healthier and more attractive than “inbred,” single-race people. Yet if you bring up the topic of ethnic interests, most of these same people will tell you that two random Europeans are no more genetically similar to each other than they are to a random African.
When it comes to promoting miscegenation, genetic differences exist and matter. But when it comes to white people expressing their ethnic interests, leftists retreat to Lewontin’s fallacy.
Feb 11, 2010 7:29 pm |
Well, my impression was that a lot of that racial masochism stuff flowed from America to Europe. But I guess I don’t know as much about that as half-consciously imagined I did.
The idea of human equality and freedom came from Europe first, where do you think America’s settlers got their ideas from?
The first group to officially protest slavery and promote ideas of equality were German Mennonites.
Even to this day Europe considers itself superior, more moral, more anti-racist than America.
Feb 11, 2010 9:22 pm |
Of course Europeans invented the heritage of America, and, notably for our purposes, invented the Enlightenment. But the crux of racial masochism is the will to dis-conserve your society by importing bearers of alien culture and biology — specifically as permanent residents, not as guestworkers. After all, if this masochism were a matter of Sweden simply deciding to tithe 10% of its GDP to Uganda every year but not allowing immigration, we might decry it but it wouldn’t spell the end of our civilization. By the time the Western tradition arrived at population replacement (or at the very least massive immigration), the USA was dry behind the ears and participating in shaping events.
Whose idea was population replacement? And who enacted it first? If everyone in Germany (the majority of people plus the majority of elites) really agreed that Turkish guest workers arriving in 1963 were guest workers, then that’s what they were — even the many of these who would wind up never going home. Once the probability of most of them being sent home went below 50% or so, whatever year that happened, then they were residents and mass immigration had taken place. In America the Ted Kennedy immigration bill of ‘65 was the big change. Though I think I may have heard that it did not allow for *mass* non-white immigration at first. If that’s true then we wouldn’t say that the USA had already crossed the Rubicon in 1965.
Of course, who did it first in their own country isn’t a sure guide to where the cultural forces producing the whole debacle came from. But it is a good signpost and is the first thing one would want to nail down.
Finally, I would note that while some German super-protestants may have been the left vanguard at some point, it’s the USA that was the incubator for massive reproduction of super-protestants and wound up with a big population of them.
Feb 12, 2010 12:05 am |
Finally, I would note that while some German super-protestants may have been the left vanguard at some point, it’s the USA that was the incubator for massive reproduction of super-protestants and wound up with a big population of them.
No. “Super-Protestants” are not and have not been the left vanguard.
Feb 12, 2010 12:49 am |
Well I know that’s Mencius Moldbug’s terminology. I don’t mean to ratify his entire view about those matters, not at all. I do suspect that having non-conformist protestants come to the USA and multiply plentifully has had some effect on our history. Who would you expect to join these offbeat, embattled little sects? People high in Openness to Experience, which per wikipedia has a heritability of 0.50 — it’s also well known for its correlations with intellectuality and liberalism.
I’m aware that Mencius attempts to stick it to the super-protestants and starkly exonerate the jews in a way that certainly *sounded* pathetic — but I don’t yet have the background in that area that would let me form a strong opinion.
Feb 12, 2010 10:31 am |
Shows how low Harvard will go to get enough darkies on the faculty.
Leave a Reply